aderfp633
Inscrit le: 27 Sep 2011
Messages: 7915
Localisation: England
|
 Posté le: Dim Sep 22, 2013 8:28 am Sujet du message: Toronto island airport: Residents voice concern ov |
 |
|
{Toronto island airport: Residents voice concern over proposed expansion}
Photos View gallery zoom Of course, the usual waterfront condo-dwelling suspects came to question, criticize,[url=http://www.longchamp-handbags-outlet.net]longchamp le pliage[/url], and heckle proposed Billy Bishop airport expansion Monday night,[url=http://www.longchamp-handbags-outlet.net]longchamp sale[/url], but concern over Porter’s plan to bring jets downtown was not limited to the airport’s neighbours.There was the man from Bloor and Runnymede concerned about flyover “jackhammer” jet sound, “Gord from the Beaches” who has a flight path over his house, and a doctor concerned about black carbon. The only member of the public who made a conditionally supportive statement splits his time between Toronto and Vancouver, and urged the crowd to consider the national interest of more airline competition. But he wanted to know if the city could ensure there would be protection against West Jet buying Porter. “The city is in a difficult position dictating terms to a private enterprise,” said Christopher Dunn, a city project manager.In April, Porter Airlines announced it had conditionally ordered 12 of Bombardier’s new CSeries jets,[url=http://www.longchamp-handbags-outlet.net]longchamp le pliage[/url], which are able to fly further than the current crop of Q400 turboprops, to destinations like Vancouver. Before Porter can fly jets downtown, it must win changes to a tripartite agreement that governs airport operations, namely lifting a ban on jets and approving a runway expansion. The public consultation is looking at how Porter’s request would impact noise, economics, land use, marine assessments, public health, and transportation in Toronto. Staff are aiming to have a report before council by December.Before the Metro Hall meeting Monday night, deeply skeptical people browsed display boards on aviation and marine impacts, and asked pointed questions, giving the undertaking the feel of a somewhat hostile science fair. A common word muttered between people united in opposition: “Ridiculous.”One woman told a Porter employee with an airplane lapel pin that the airport had done “horrible things” to the Bathurst Quay Community. “You don’t live there,” she said.“Yes I do,” he said.Claire Sparks, who has lived in the airport neighbourhood for 27 years says she feels like she was a victim of “bait and switch.” She bought there knowing about the tripartite agreement,[url=http://www.longchamp-handbags-outlet.net]longchamp sale[/url], which was meant to keep the airport small, she says.She thinks Porter is excellent to fly, but the noise is disruptive. “When there’s a faint rain in the air it feels like they’re coming in through my living room,” she says, laughing. “I’ve even told (Porter CEO Robert) Deluce that.”City staff and consultants gave presentations in a large meeting room filled to capacity. Downtown councillors Adam Vaughan and Pam McConnell were there.Concerns were many and varied — the financial future of Porter Airlines, traffic, the waterfront revitalization. A number of people expressed concern that studies, such as one on health effects — weren’t yet available. People heard that film studios are concerned about the noise, major corporate accounts view the airport largely as a benefit, and that condo developers say that the under-40 group moving downtown want to use the airport for business and leisure.The room also heard that the cap on flights — 202 a day — is expected to remain the same — but the jets will increase capacity by 15 per cent. Whether the new jets will meet noise requirements is still unknown as they are still in development. “The aircraft has yet to be tested,” aviation consultant Martin Leprohon said to snickers.“It just feels that the entire process for this issue, for this contentious issue that is going to affect our waterfront for a lifetime — it’s irreversible, if you fill in the lake even an inch it’s irreversible — it feels as if it’s being rushed, it feels as if there is a mandate to get this done sooner rather than later and not pay the attention that is required for this issue,” said Anshul Kapoor of NoJetsTO.The city announced that a town hall meeting scheduled for later this week will be bumped back to Sept. 19, so residents can have more time to review technical reports. That date may still change due to a scheduling conflict brought up Monday evening.When told that both Porter and the Toronto Port Authority would be at the next meeting, a voice called out from the back of the room:“We don’t want to hear from them.”
_________________
People watching the forthcoming beginning of the German half of the inhabitants of Berlin are no interested in co-optation |
|
