Index du Forum

aderfp633 · Inscrit le: 27 Sep 2011 Messages: 7915 Localisation: England

Tho DisCount ugg boots ught Mesh
We the people of the United States of America,[url=http://www.ugg-boots-sale.org]cheap ugg[/url], in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common Defence, promote the general Welfare and secure the Blessing of Liberty for ourselves and our Posterity; do ordain a #file_links[D:\keywords15.txt,1,[url=http://www.ugg-boots-sale.org]ugg outlet[/url],S] nd establish this Constitution for the United States of America - The Founding FathersTerminologyTranziCaliPhascistLogoRealismFeed LotRSS 2.0Comments Only The Supreme Court will be deciding another affirmative action case, again in Michigan regarding race based admission policies. I am on the side of no race based admission policies in public schools . The plaintiffs, however, simply don’t believe in the colorblind Constitution . As through history, the Republicans are opposing race based law, while the Democratic Party and its supporters favor such things. The only difference between now and then is which specific races are to benefit, but the essentialist racist view remains. In much more important news, Blizzard is removing the online auction house from Diablo III. Although I played endless hours of Diablo and Diablo II, I only played about the first half of the first act of Diablo III primarily because it was online only. Therefore this isn t much of a personal issue with me, although based on my game design experience I think the critics have it mostly right.What I find interesting, though is this quote Many players supposedly spend more time in the Auction House than they do the actual campaignI could have told them that before they started. I used to play a multiplayer online dungeon games1 back in the late 1970s In fact, I knew the guy who first sold virtual gaming gear for real money. Although that was unusual, I knew a number of gamers who, having mostly mastered the game, still spent hours and hours playing but just trading items, not actually playing the game as intended. They did it mainly because they enjoyed the social interaction and trading, but if you have a game where particular types of gear are a status marker, you will have players who spend #file_links[D:\keywords12.txt,1,S] all their time trading to get it. Those will soon be followed by gamer sweatshops of people grinding the game to generate in game resources. Successful multiplayer games also tend to have the same (if much simpler) economic problems as real world economies. In this case due to early mover advantage and grinder bots, the system was hit with massive inflation, stifling the ability of new players to succeed. While I think Blizzard handled this poorly without, apparently, thinking it through, it is not in fact an easy problem. I think it would do wonders for economists to have to manage such things before being allowed to experiment in the real world.1 One of them, avatar , was clearly the inspiration for the successful Wizardry series. Time for another dip in the pool of Old Media bias and incompetence. Today s edition will also touch on cowardice and how the truth to power meme is just a poser s tale told by comfortably ensconced appartchiks.Let s start with fear and a report on how the press corp fears Obama. It is interesting to me how these same journalists had no fear of former President Bush, because they knew (despite what they wrote) that he wouldn t really use the power of his administration to punish them. Obama,[url=http://www.ugg-boots-sale.org]cheap uggs[/url], however, is clearly different and this certainly gets results and quite a lot of Sargent Schultz dereliction. It also means that when something that fits the Narrative comes along, it gets reported without any actual fact checking because Obama!But, let me be clear - it s not always cowardice matched with stalker level obsession, sometimes it s just rank incompetence of people who simply have no clue about the subject of their writing.Keep this in mind the next time someone tells you all I read in the New York Times .P.S. The hits just keep coming This article makes a point that occurred to me after I read Russian President Vladimir Putin s editorial in the New York Times. That is, Putin s writers clearly have read the works of the MAL and cleverly served up their own tropes to smash President Obama. This puts Obama and his supporters in a bind, because to argue against Putin s agitprop they would have to disown their own well recorded oikophobia which would be more hurtful than taking the hit from Putin. It is a measure of the MAL s parochialism and lack of thoughtfulness that enables brutes like Putin to get away with being brutes will styming any reponse from the USA as long as it has a MAList government.But of course, for the MAL, there are no foreign enemies, only domestic ones. That s why Obama will eagerly (if not pathetically) grasp any negotiating straw from place like Iran, but won t talk to the Congressional GOP. One can t help but laugh, though, at Obama cancelling his Asian trip so he can sit in the White House and not negotiate. Surely he could have done that in Asia too, or would it have been too much for him to talk with foreign leaders and not talk to domestic ones at the same time? If men were angels, no government would be necessary. If angels were to govern men, neither external nor internal controls on government would be necessary. In framing a government which is to be administered by men over men, the great difficulty lies in this: you must first enable the government to control the governed; and in the next place oblige it to control itself. A dependence on the people is, no doubt, the primary control on the government; but experience has taught mankind the necessity of auxiliary precautions. James Madison Federalist Paper #51This is the key point that the regulators always forget they look at stupid things people do and want to stop them from doing such things, without ever considering how giving people power and money makes them better people. We have the amazing spectacle of the National Park Service shutting down open air mall sites that do not require any staff so that WWII veterans are denied access. Let it be clear that these sites have never been closed until now but suddenly, in the midst of a government slimdown, the NPS has the staff and time to put up barrycades. Can some one explain this as other than in effect, hostage taking by the Obama Administration?In the same vein we have other parks being shutdown that have no dependency whatsoever on the NPS and indeed, in some cases being net revenue generators for the federal government. That means the Obama Administration, in the midst of the upcoming debt ceiling limit, is willing to forgo revenue in order to punish the public for not getting his way. Yet people claim Obama has the best interests of the citizenry at heart P.S. Meanwhile The New Republic is apparently calling for using tanks against the Republicans in the House of Representatives, while former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi recommends bypassing Congress. And schools show I pledge to serve Barak Obama videos. Where did all the civility go? Perhaps it s never been there. I see this kind of statement made frequently with regard to the federal debt ceiling A failure to raise the debt ceiling to pay for bills that Congress has already contracted could lead to a worldwide recession or worse.No! How can any one be that clueless? You don t borrow money to pay off previously borrowed money. The term for doing that is bankruptcy . You pay off debts by using your revenue stream and the federal government revenues a #file_links[D:\keywords13.txt,1,S] re not dependent in any way on the debt ceiling.Of course, we have President Obama who is dumb enough to say in public raising the debt ceiling does not increase our debt [ ] All it does is it says you got to pay the bills that you ve already racked up, Congress . That s pathetic, even for a guy who regularly muffs his facts.Meanwhile we are having an actual issue with passing a continuing resolution to keep the government funded (which could actually impact debt payments), which is primarily because the Democratic Party, particularly those in the Senate, have been massively derelict in their duties while the GOP in the House has at least made an effort. Yet I am confident Old Media will hold the former blameless, because Obama!P.S. The story of legislation trying to express the Constitutional requirements in law but blocked, of course, by the Democratic Party, which has no interest in Constitutionality and fiscal responsibility. We just got our POR-care notification and we ll get to pay 168% more for our healthcare. We could hold that down to only 104% more if we significantly increased our deductible. And of course, we have to change our health insurance plan the old was was wrong and, as serfs instead of free citizens, we cannot be permitted to keep it. But of course, it s for The People. As we know, we have 30 million without health insurance in the USA. The CBO estimates that POR-care will, after a few years, reduce this to 30 million. Plus, the chocolate ration will be increased to 40 grams.Meanwhile, we can see where our ruling class is taking us if we dare to ask how can a rich country have shortages? All it takes is enough governing. News from the the global warmening crew, this time from Germany the German ministries insist that it is important not to detract from the effectiveness of climate change warnings by discussing the past 15 years lack of global warming. Doing so, they say, would result in a loss of the support necessary for pursuing rigorous climate policies. Climate policy needs the element of fear, [German Green Party politician Hermann] Ott openly admits. Otherwise, no politician would take on this topic. Well, we certainly wouldn t want any sort of dispassionate, rational discussion on the subject. It might not come out they way the EUlite want!I did like this bit, though not connecting the dots. Earlier in the article we haveA survey conducted on behalf of SPIEGEL found a dramatic shift in public opinion Germans are losing their fear of climate change. While in 2006 a sizeable majority of 62 percent expressed a fear of global warning, that number has now become a minority of just 39 percent.Is that what Ott considers to be the effectiveness of climate change warnings ? I m all for that kind of effectiveness .P.S. Isn t it amazing how people can see this, yet think that couldn t happen with other government regulatory policies I support ? Dutch King Willem-Alexander gave a nationally televised speech to his nation s Parliament on September 16th declaring that the welfare state was dead. The message, written for the King by Prime Minister Mark Rutte s government, stated that current levels of state spending for unemployment benefits and subsidized health care are unsustainable amid Europe s ongoing economic malaise. With Moody s credit rating agency threatening to downgr #file_links[D:\keywords11.txt,1,S] ade Dutch debt, the King announced that citizens soon will be expected to create their own social and financial safety nets with much less help from the state. Chriss StreetWe should be more like Europe, you say? Interesting Former President Bill Clinton we need young people to get financially reamed by POR-care to make it work. Yeah, that ll sell it to the youngsters. I mean, I know they ll respond enthusiastically when I tell them you have to join up so you can pay for geezers like me! Or maybe Clinton should have just said sign up, young people, because Obama! . Works for so many other things A big recent story is that President Obama s push for changing our health care system had its genesis in a throw away line from a speech. I ve seen some counter evidence (such as Obama promoting government payer health care in 2003) but I want to wonder about the back story why was this story published?While Politico isn t as in the tank as say the New York Times it certainly has a strong pro-Obama bias and I have little doubt this piece, which isn t really news, was published with some political purpose in mind. Are they trying to distance Obama from the now obvious to all but the totally blinkered train wreck? Shift the blame to the Democratic Congress that actually wrote the legislation? I call it POR-care because it was far more then House Speaker Pelosi and Senate Majority Leader Reid who created and passed it, with Obama mainly standing around trying to look involved between golf outings.The article certainly does not, in my view, reflect well on Obama that he would make such a major change on what s basically a whim. It could be Politico trying to distance itself from the debacle. But I do think it s neat that with a free press, one still has to read it as the Soviets did Pravda. Apparently amnesty for illegal immigrants is switching to Plan B after the initial partially honest plan failed to come together. I understand why the oikophobic Democratic Party wants to do this (to help with that fundamental transformation of the USA) but what could the GOP supporters possibly see in it, other than I ll gladly sell out my party and my nation for a nickel ? There s no political upside for the GOP nor for the supporters personally, except a momentary stroke by Old Media (which will last until a villain is needed for The Narrative). These people are utterly incomprehensible to me. Can any one explain it to me? Conservatives are frequently (if not autonomically) accused of being fascist wannabes, but when actual fascism tries to creep in, it s almost always via the Modern American Left. Today s case in point is New York City and it s likely next mayor who seems to have been a big fan of the Sandinistas and the Castro regime in Cuba. The MAL, who attack people for being on the same stage as some one else who s been on the same stage as a fascist, seem as usual completely unconcerned about one of their own who has literally supported fascists. Any estimates on (1) how soon this will inflict massive damage on New York City and (2) how long after that it s blamed on conservatives?Meanwhile, of the team reveals the creeping socialism he sees in the government take over of the bond market . As I understand it, t #file_links[D:\keywords14.txt,1,S] he latest debate tactic among the Democrat chattering class of political wingnuts is to point out that Obamacare is nothing more than a 1999 Republican plan with a touch of Romneycare thrown in. So, why are they now so desperate to destroy this legislation they were for before they were against it. Jack is BackYes, I ve encountered that myself (I m waiting for our Mr. Eagar to lay it on us, he seems to do an excellent job of firing off the latest MAList talking points).Of course, at a base level this is like blaming a book author for the flop of a Hollywood movie based on the book for which the author was never consulted.On a deeper level, what is actually the point? That the GOP can promote stupid, damaging policies too? You don t have to work to convince me of that. Even if the claim is true, it makes this stupid, damaging legislation not a problem because ? I suspect that because of the ingrained group think / political correctness that prevails on the MAL these days, they consider it a strong argument. After all, whatever gonzo policy President Obama trots out they support, because Obama! 21 September 2013 Saturday Political prosecution Posted by aog10:19 on 21 September 2013 Comments (34) Trackbacks (0) Ping URL Former House Majority Leader Tom Delay s conviction was overturned with the appeals court ruling that the evidence was legally insufficient to sustain the charges.This follows in the former Senator Ted Stevens case (which also involved prosecutorial misconduct) and the hounding of then Alaska Governor Sarah Palin on bogus ethics charges. At what point do we being to wonder if our criminal justice system is being used as a partisan weapon via unsustainable indictments?All of this in addition to the targeting of groups by the IRS based on their political views and, in some cases, anti-Obama rhetoric. Targeting that continued after the IRS claimed it had stopped. As has been pointed out it is in fact more concerning that there doesn t seem to have been any high level direction of this activity, it was spontaneous inside the IRS, even though it was clearly inspired by the Obama Administration and Old Media agitprop. That s a level of corruption far beyond what Nixon managed. Why should a conservative have any faith in the government or regulation when it s so blatantly used for political advantage? The coverage of the Navy Yard shooting seems to have crested rather abruptly. I agree that it s because the actual details don t fit The Narrative and are therefore not politically useful to Old Media. It was big news when the shooter was from Texas but now that he s a black Obama supporter and not a stereotypical Texan, it s not something to talk about. Better to just misidentify the perpetrator. As POR-care hurtles down the track to disaster, it s mordantly amusing (when not infuriating) to see former passengers struggle to jump off something they pushed to get started (not to mention the desperate agitprop). Federal workers apparently think it s great as long as they don t have to participate just like any good feudal aristocracy.I think at this point the best strategy for people who want a working health care system in the USA is not to try to defund POR-care (for various reasons, such as it s not going to actually happen) but to attach riders to the continuing resolutions for government funding (since we don t do budgets anymore thanks to the Democratic Party controlled Senate) that eliminate all exemptions, waivers, and illegal delays for POR-care, especially the Congressional staff exemption. Politically that will be a lot harder for the MALists to defend and if passed in to law will be difficult for even Old Media to use to blame the POR-care disaster on the GOP.P.S. Oh look, time to dial down expectations now that reality is hitting the fan. What was the point of POR-care, again? Meanwhile, Old Media does its part to keep the political climate adjusted.P.P.S. I have to add this about POR-care getting the government back in to your bedroom. It s for your own good!P.P.S. Bureaucrats don t select for innovation but for what fits in the boxes on the form.
相关的主题文章：

[url=http://cgi.ebay.com.au/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=140751362926]cheap uggs 1 Uggs on sale 14导[/url]

[url=http://www.tcswwlyj.com/E_GuestBook.asp]cheap uggs[/url]

[url=http://fszjw.hk18.loginhost.cn/E_GuestBook.asp]cheap uggs[/url]
_________________
People watching the forthcoming beginning of the German half of the inhabitants of Berlin are no interested in co-optation

Index du Forum -> Raquettes -> cheap ugg Tho Ugg outlet ught Mesh